Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. claude-opus-4-8 · xhigh
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · claude-opus-4-8 · xhigh
76.80Overall
Compared with claude-opus-4-8 · xhigh
- grok-4.6 · xhigh
Overall: +0.05 ptsReference cost $2.51 ($6.66 less)Evaluation time 144m 16s (42m 6s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | claude-opus-4-8 · xhigh | grok-4.6 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | claude-opus-4-8xhigh 76.80 | grok-4.6xhigh 76.85+0.05 pts |
| Backend engineering | claude-opus-4-8xhigh 61 | grok-4.6xhigh 78+17 pts |
| Frontend interaction | claude-opus-4-8xhigh 87 | grok-4.6xhigh 80−7 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | claude-opus-4-8xhigh 90 | grok-4.6xhigh 85−5 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | claude-opus-4-8xhigh 68 | grok-4.6xhigh 64−4 pts |
| Maintainability | claude-opus-4-8xhigh 55 | grok-4.6xhigh 59+4 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | claude-opus-4-8 · xhigh | grok-4.6 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | claude-opus-4-8xhigh $9.18 | grok-4.6xhigh $2.51−$6.66 |
| Evaluation time | claude-opus-4-8xhigh 102m 10s | grok-4.6xhigh 144m 16s+41.2% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-4-8xhigh | grok-4.6xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 7 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 16 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 11 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 12 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-4-8xhigh | grok-4.6xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 12 / 15 | 12 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 15 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-4-8xhigh | grok-4.6xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 10 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-4-8xhigh | grok-4.6xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 16 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | claude-opus-4-8xhigh | grok-4.6xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.