Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. MiniMax-M3 · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · MiniMax-M3 · high
46Backend engineering
Compared with MiniMax-M3 · high
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · max
Backend engineering: +27 ptsReference cost $0.11 ($0.20 less)Evaluation time 30m 52s (8m 46s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | MiniMax-M3 · high | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · max |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | MiniMax-M3high 46 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 73+27 pts |
| Overall | MiniMax-M3high 52.95 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 73.60+20.65 pts |
| Frontend interaction | MiniMax-M3high 65 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 75+10 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | MiniMax-M3high 50 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 80+30 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | MiniMax-M3high 59 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 66+7 pts |
| Maintainability | MiniMax-M3high 44 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 61+17 pts |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | MiniMax-M3 · high | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | MiniMax-M3high $0.31 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax $0.11−$0.20 |
| Evaluation time | MiniMax-M3high 22m 6s | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax 30m 52s+39.7% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3high | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 7 / 20 | 11 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 11 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 4 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 9 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 15 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3high | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| State continuity | 10 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 7 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 15 / 25 | 17 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3high | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 0 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 0 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 30 / 40 | 30 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3high | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 14 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3high | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashmax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 14 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 12 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.