Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Differences vs. MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · xhigh
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · xhigh
82Frontend interaction
Compared with MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · xhigh
- glm-5.3 · high
Frontend interaction: tiedReference cost $0.43 ($0.39 more)Evaluation time 23m 23s (12m 10s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · xhigh | glm-5.3 · high |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend interaction | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh 82 | glm-5.3high 82Tied |
| Overall | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh 70.20 | glm-5.3high 64.40−5.8 pts |
| Backend engineering | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh 68 | glm-5.3high 69+1 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh 75 | glm-5.3high 50−25 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh 59 | glm-5.3high 66+7 pts |
| Maintainability | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh 51 | glm-5.3high 68+17 pts |
Frontend interaction evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Frontend interaction evaluation| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · xhigh | glm-5.3 · high |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh $0.038 | glm-5.3high $0.43+$0.39 |
| Evaluation time | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh 11m 13s | glm-5.3high 23m 23s+108.4% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh | glm-5.3high |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 11 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 15 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 10 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 15 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh | glm-5.3high |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 7 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 15 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh | glm-5.3high |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 10 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 30 / 40 | 20 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh | glm-5.3high |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 14 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashxhigh | glm-5.3high |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.