Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Differences vs. MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · high
88Frontend interaction
Compared with MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · high
- claude-opus-4-8 · max
Frontend interaction: tiedReference cost $4.18 ($4.16 more)Evaluation time 32m 18s (22m 37s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · high | claude-opus-4-8 · max |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend interaction | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh 88 | claude-opus-4-8max 88Tied |
| Overall | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh 67.45 | claude-opus-4-8max 75.85+8.4 pts |
| Backend engineering | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh 62 | claude-opus-4-8max 64+2 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh 65 | claude-opus-4-8max 85+20 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh 64 | claude-opus-4-8max 68+4 pts |
| Maintainability | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh 51 | claude-opus-4-8max 55+4 pts |
Frontend interaction evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Frontend interaction evaluation| Metric | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash · high | claude-opus-4-8 · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh $0.024 | claude-opus-4-8max $4.18+$4.16 |
| Evaluation time | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh 9m 41s | claude-opus-4-8max 32m 18s+233.5% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh | claude-opus-4-8max |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 6 / 20 | 7 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 11 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 13 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh | claude-opus-4-8max |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 15 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 14 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh | claude-opus-4-8max |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 0 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 30 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh | claude-opus-4-8max |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | MiniMax-M3.1-Flashhigh | claude-opus-4-8max |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 13 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.